I think I’m going to be talking about this distinction (between “control a problem/prevent a threat” and “help a person” as basic premises for healthcare/government aid programs/etc.) a lot more, because often there’s a thing that happens where
I’ll hear about some new policy or whatever and go “Ooh, that sounds like bad news,”
and it’s not that the specific practical things it proposes to do are totally bad, some of them may even be pretty beneficial,
but if the tone, the mindset, the overall goal is “prevent these bad dangerous people from causing trouble for good normal people,”
that obviously makes me suspicious even if the actual plan is basically good.